Genre film theory and criticism

Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Texts Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.

Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape "Donate to the archive" User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. He lives in Los Angeles. Write a Review. Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews. Search review text. Displaying 1 - 25 of 25 reviews. True story: I got a D in my first year film class 20 years ago, never studied any film production and somehow managed to become an award winning independent documentary filmmaker. My incredible dIrector of photography DID go to film school and gave me his 45 year old copy of this book which supposedly is the go to theory and criticism.

Film is not an art form that ages well. Not only does the equipment change every few years, the expectations by audiences of aesthetics and storytelling does as well. It would be interesting to compare it to a recent edition. I'm so sick of Lacan Roy Llh. The bible. Alborz Taheri. May add a new dimension to the films we watch. Each edition of the book has a different addition so if you are looking for a particular film you may want to peruse the book in person at the table of contents goes by article, not film title.

However, the basic nature of the book stays the same from one edition to the next. But he expands the concept of genre to a very multifaceted process. But at the same time he argues for a stronger historical complexity in the study of genres and for a stronger emphasis on the study of genres in historical contexts and to actual interpretative communities.

He adds a pragmatic dimension to his earlier semantic—syntactic dimensions to include the user-contexts aspect. The cognitive-emotional genre theory also opposes the dominant Freudian, Lacanian, or Jungian-inspired psychology in the Screen tradition of genre studies. But the most ambitious attempt to formulate a cognitive and emotional theory of genre is that of Grodal Neale []for instance, discusses the evolutionary model, used by Schatz This distinction between two modes is imbedded in our cognitive framework and is related to the distinction between a play mode and a reality mode.

Combinations of each of these communicative roles or purposes of course result in different subgenres of documentary. Bibliography Altman, R. In: Grant, B. Altman, R. British Film Institute, London.

Genre film theory and criticism

Barnouw, E. Oxford University Press, New York. Bazin, A. The evolution of the Western. In: Bazin, A. Bondebjerg, Ib, a. Engaging with Reality. Documentary and Globalization. Intellect, Bristol. Bondebjerg, Ib, b. Documentary and cognitive theory: narrative, emotion, memory. Media and Communication 2 113— Bordwell, D. Narration in the Fiction Film.

The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Film, Style and Mode of Production to Routledge, New York, London. Braudy, L. Anchor, New York. Buscombe, E. The idea of genre in the American cinema. Carroll, N. The Philosophy of Horror, or Paradoxes of the Heart. Routledge, New York. Film, emotion and genre. In: Plantinga, C. Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp.

Cawelti, J. Adventure, Mystery and Romance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Clover, C. Comolli, J. In: Mast, A. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.